Maghreb bloggers deplore violent protests

Algerian blogger Akram Belkaid writes about a Benghazi demonstration
					mourning slain US Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
					[akram-belkaid.blogspot.com]

Algerian blogger Akram Belkaid writes about a Benghazi demonstration mourning slain US Ambassador Christopher Stevens. [akram-belkaid.blogspot.com]

  • COMMENT 3
  • Print this article
  • increase decrease

An amateur film ridiculing the Prophet Mohammed unleashed a week of raucous protests around the region. In the online world, reactions were no less forceful.

While bloggers roundly condemned the offensive nature of the film, many equally denounced acts of violence and destruction.

The author of the Algerian "Mozabite" blog called on Muslims to follow in the footsteps of Prophet Mohammed and not seek revenge.

"Don't use violence to respond to those who want to attack the Prophet Mohammed, who represents the whole of humanity," he wrote.

By releasing the trailer on September 11th, "The producers of the scandalous film intended to sow fitna among Muslims", wrote blogger Dézedien.

Film an attempt to make Muslims look like 'barbarians'

Activists posting on the Facebook page "Algerian Special Envoys" made little distinction between the defamation of Islam and violence perpetrated in the name of Islam.

"The main aim behind all this is not to paint the Prophet in a bad light (peace and blessings of God be upon him), but to provoke Muslims and steer them to violence, killing foreigners and burning down embassies in response, so that they can say: 'Look, these Muslims are barbarians'," said bank clerk Lokmane Bouider.

In Benghazi, activists mobilised online to decry the violence. Some wondered about the country's future in light of last week's deadly attack on the US consulate that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others.

"We are entering a stage of chaos that would lead the country to dangerous turns threatening Libya's existence and undermining our hopes about building a modern democratic state based on constitution, law and peaceful rotation of power," Badri Sharif El Manai blogged.

"Therefore, where do those people want to take Libya to? To hell? To another Somalia or Afghanistan, where our country turns into a hotbed for every adventurer?!" he added.

Some Libyan internet users expressed disbelief at the misdirected anger of Benghazi protestors.

They reminded readers that the US diplomat was not responsible for releasing the anti-Islam film, and peaceful demonstrations would suffice to show protest.

Blogger Anas Abu Mees said that raucous protests only contributed to "disseminating and promoting such works".

"What happened in Benghazi this evening is only a repetition of many other similar situations: a nobody produces a work (a film, book, etc.) denigrating Islam, and then crowds of people react with volcanic anger that burns, destroys, and, in today's case, kills everything in its way without any regard to man's blood," he wrote in an article, entitled "Defenders of the Holy".

"Our Prophet says, 'He who kills a party to a covenant won't smell the scent of paradise'," Abu Mees said. Some Libyans created Facebook groups and staged demonstrations to mourn the death of the US ambassador.

Abdallah Fazzan posted on the Facebook page "Opposing the Death of Chris in Tripoli": "We mourn a great friend of the Libyan people in Ambassador Stevens, and we apologise for failing to protect an honoured guest."

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS ARTICLE? (TOTAL VOTES: 4)

3 Dislike(s)

ADD A COMMENT (COMMENT POLICY) * DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

* DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

  • READER COMMENTS

    محمد راشد

    2012-10-15

    One of the things that are very offensive and which hurt the dignity of nations, and indeed become a cause for dissension and popular anger, is mocking religions and making fun and deriding any form of religious creed. The Islamic world and the Muslim Community, and indeed Christendom and the Copts all over the world denounce the offensive film about the Messenger of Allah, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and they have stated that this is an idea that is devoid of any culture or civility or any form of freedom, whether it be of opinion or expression. First of all, how could we portray the Messenger of Allah in a film to be viewed by people? The Messenger of Allah cannot be represented by anyone in acting. Secondly, how could we depict the Messenger of Allah as a womanizer and portray him as a hedonist who adores women? And the question that intelligent thinking people should be asking is how could a messenger from Allah the Exalted and the Magnificent come to people without having a good moral character, and indeed having the highest morals in the whole world? This film unfortunately shows the lack of general knowledge and culture, even about religions. We, as Muslims, believe in Jesus and Mary, and we believe in all the messengers and prophets that were sent to humanity, and even more than that, we respect all the creeds and beliefs of all nations in the world, even those that are not monotheistic. In fact, it is our duty to invite them to monotheism only. The Messenger, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, lived together with the unbelievers in the beginning of his life and his call, and he did not ridicule them. Rather, his stance was as if he were saying to them how could you worship idols that cannot bring anything good or bad? How can you pray to so many idols instead of to Allah the Exalted and the Magnificent alone? How could you worship idols made of dates and other statues and then eat them? How could that happen? And the Messenger of Allah used to invite them to Islam with utmost compassion, and indeed he would explain the faith to them and the principles of monotheism and patience in the face of trials and patience until the will of Allah the Exalted and the Magnificent is done, as he is the knower of the unseen and the future, and he has power over everything.

  • عيسى موسى

    2012-10-15

    Islam is the last of the divine religions, and this fact is found in the Torah and the Bible, and the Holy Quran has come with this message brought by Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). Muhammad had an upbringing that was a harsh one for anyone to go through, as his mother Aminah Bint Wahb died while he was little, and his father too died while he was still young, and he was nursed by a wet nurse named Halimah Al-Sa’diyyah, and he had nothing left in this world other than his uncle and grandfather, both of whom were not monotheists, and they were idolaters just like the people of Quraish. The Messenger was not born into a family of nobility or status or power so that he would become a tyrant, and he did not want to be enemies of anybody. Rather, he was peaceful and forbearing in all his actions and behaviors, even in his preaching, even in his forbearance towards the unbelievers, towards his wives, and towards his companions. The Messenger of Allah came with the philosophy of patience, and the philosophy of interaction, and the philosophy of tolerance, and he faced those that were obstinate with his tolerance and patience and good moral character as he invited them to enter Islam while the companions of the Messenger of Allah were angry and antagonistic towards the leaders of Quraish as the latter would torture those that embraced Islam. Wasn’t he, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, able to meet the enmity of the unbelievers with the same? Wasn’t he capable of killing the unbelievers and protecting those first Muslims that believed in his message of tolerance? Wasn’t he capable of declaring war on the unbelievers and protect them from the people of Mecca? Indeed, he had the power to conquer the whole world. But the Messenger of Allah used patience, tolerance and prayer to Allah in his call to Islam.

  • إبراهيم الحداد

    2012-10-15

    Peaceful demonstration is one of the features of a civilized nation, and it is also a sign that a nation is advanced, and we see that in many of the western countries while we do not see it in the Arab countries. Why? Because the western countries guarantee freedom for their people, just like they guarantee all their human rights, and they deal with them as human beings whose humanity is respected, and the government provides all the means that allow the western man to live freely and democratically. This leads to freedom of expression, freedom of opinion, and also the awareness and understanding of the demonstrators that the property of the state should be preserved, and that they should not set fire to cars and destroy buildings as we saw happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and all the Arab countries where the Arab revolutions have taken place.